EOR vs employing through your own entity in India
Reviewed by Mellow Editorial Team, HR & payroll content team
Hiring in India through an Employer of Record means a third party becomes the legal employer on your behalf, handling compliance, payroll and statutory filings. Setting up your own entity gives you direct control but carries significantly more administrative weight.
What each model actually means
An Employer of Record (EOR) contracts with your worker on your behalf. The EOR handles EPF contributions (12% each from employer and employee), ESI where applicable, TDS deductions, Form 16 issuance, Form 24Q quarterly filings, and compliance with India's four consolidated Labour Codes now in force from 2025. You direct the work; the EOR is the legal employer on paper.
A own-entity model means you incorporate a legal presence in India — typically a Private Limited Company or a Liaison/Branch Office — and hire workers directly. You become the employer of record yourself, which means owning every compliance obligation outright.
Where an EOR has a genuine advantage
Speed. Incorporating in India takes weeks to months. An EOR can have someone working legally within days.
Low headcount. If you are hiring two or three people, the compliance overhead of running your own entity is difficult to justify. Statutory registrations, a dedicated payroll function, a local auditor, annual filings with the Registrar of Companies — all of this exists whether you have three employees or three hundred.
Compliance complexity. India's labour laws are state-specific in several areas. Shops and Establishments Acts, Professional Tax rates and gratuity administration vary by state. An EOR that knows these variations well absorbs that risk.
Gratuity contingency. Gratuity becomes payable after five years of continuous service — a real liability that needs to be provisioned. An EOR manages this off your balance sheet.
Testing a market. If you are not certain whether India is a long-term bet, an EOR avoids the cost and permanence of entity setup.
Where your own entity has a genuine advantage
Long-term cost. EOR fees are charged per employee per month. At scale — say, fifty or more employees — those fees aggregate into a meaningful number. Running your own payroll through an in-house team or a local payroll vendor often costs less per head.
Control and culture. When you are the legal employer, onboarding, HR policies, benefit design and employment contracts are entirely yours. EOR agreements introduce a contractual layer between you and your worker, and some employees are aware of and sensitive to that arrangement.
Business activities. An EOR is suited to employment, not to generating revenue in India. If your India team will be signing contracts, holding assets, invoicing customers or conducting substantive business, you almost certainly need your own entity for legal and tax reasons. A Liaison Office specifically cannot do revenue-generating work.
Permanence. If India is a core part of your operating model, building your own entity creates a foundation — bank accounts, a local identity, the ability to sponsor visas and establish vendor relationships — that an EOR cannot replicate.
The honest middle ground
The framing of "EOR versus entity" is sometimes a false choice. Many companies use an EOR to hire their first few India-based employees quickly, then incorporate once headcount or business activity justifies it and transfer employment across. That sequencing is practical and common.
There are also limits to what an EOR can do. EOR arrangements work cleanly for employees, not for business partners or contractors who should be independent. They do not create a permanent establishment in India (though you should take tax advice on that point for your specific situation). And the quality of compliance varies substantially between EOR providers — the critical question is not just whether an EOR can hire in India, but whether their payroll and statutory filings are accurate, timely and auditable.
What to ask before deciding
Before choosing either route, work through these questions:
- How many people are you hiring, and over what timeline?
- Will your India team generate revenue or sign contracts on the company's behalf?
- How long are you committed to operating in India?
- What is your tolerance for managing local compliance directly, or paying someone else to do it?
- If you use an EOR, can you inspect their payroll working, review Form 16s and verify EPF remittances?
The last question matters more than most buyers realise. An EOR that cannot give you clear answers on those mechanics is carrying compliance risk that ultimately sits with you, whatever the contract says.
If you want to see how a structured EOR handles multi-country payroll obligations in practice, how Mellow runs payroll across six countries covers the operational detail.
---
Run HR and payroll in India with Mellow
Mellow brings HR, payroll and 12 AI agents into one platform — built to handle India properly, with payroll included, from £4 per employee per month. The AI agents don't just answer questions; they generate contracts, run cost estimates and draft letters for you.
[Start a free trial →](/register)