Running a pay review in India
Reviewed by Mellow Editorial Team, HR & payroll content team
A pay review in India is the structured process of assessing and adjusting employee compensation against market benchmarks, internal equity, and business performance. Done well, it keeps you competitive, compliant, and fair — without creating cost surprises.
Decide when and how often to run reviews
Most Indian employers run one annual pay review, typically at the start of the financial year (April) or after appraisal cycles that close in January or February. Some organisations run a mid-year correction round as well, particularly for high-performers or roles where the market has moved sharply.
Before you set dates, decide whether you are running a cost-of-living adjustment, a merit-based increase, a market correction, or some combination. Each has a different methodology, different funding logic, and different implications for how you communicate to employees.
Gather the right market data
Benchmarking is only useful if the data is current and specific to your sector and city. A software engineer's market rate in Bengaluru is not the same as in Bhopal. Use at least two sources:
- Salary surveys from providers such as Mercer, Aon, or Korn Ferry give cut by industry, city, and job family. These are paid products but are the most reliable.
- Job portal data from Naukri, LinkedIn, or Indeed gives a rough directional view. Treat it as a supplement, not a primary source, because it reflects posted salaries and not actual offers.
- Offer data from your own hiring is often overlooked. If you are regularly offering new joiners more than existing employees doing the same work, you already have a compression problem.
When you benchmark, match on job content, not job title. A "Senior Manager" in a 20-person startup and a "Senior Manager" in a 5,000-person company are usually different jobs.
Understand the payroll and compliance impact
Pay increases in India do not flow through cleanly in a single line item. A salary revision touches several statutory calculations simultaneously.
Provident Fund. EPF is calculated on basic wages. If you revise basic salary, both employee and employer contributions shift — the employee contributes 12% of basic and the employer contributes 12% as well (though part of the employer share goes to EPS). If you restructure components rather than just raise the total, check whether the new basic crosses any EPF ceiling thresholds relevant to your filing.
Income tax. Employees under the new tax regime face slabs rising to 30%, with a section 87A rebate available at lower income levels and a 4% health and education cess on top. When you revise CTC mid-year, your payroll team must recalculate projected annual income and adjust TDS deductions going forward. This affects Form 24Q, which you file quarterly, and Form 16, which employees receive at year-end. Getting this wrong creates mismatches that employees notice when they file personal returns.
ESI. Employees whose gross wages fall below the applicable threshold are covered under ESI. A salary revision that pushes an employee above that threshold changes their ESI eligibility. Handle this carefully at the point of revision.
Gratuity. Gratuity is payable after five years of continuous service, calculated on last drawn basic wages and dearness allowance. A higher basic means a higher gratuity liability. If you are making significant revisions across a large tenured workforce, update your gratuity actuarial provision accordingly.
India's four consolidated Labour Codes, in force from 2025, affect how wages are defined — particularly the requirement that the wage component of CTC must form a specified proportion of total pay. Any restructuring done alongside a pay review needs to stay compliant with this definition.
Build and control your budget
The common approach is to set an overall salary budget as a percentage of your current payroll cost — the "merit pool." Finance agrees the pool; HR allocates it. A disciplined process ensures that managers cannot simply give everyone the same percentage, which rewards underperformance and demoralises top performers.
Consider structuring allocations in bands:
- Below expectations: no increase or a minimal one
- Meets expectations: a standard increment
- Exceeds or far exceeds: a higher-than-average increment, sometimes with a variable payout
This keeps total spend within the agreed pool while differentiating meaningfully. Track the distribution after manager decisions are made — skewed distributions (everyone rated "exceeds") signal calibration problems, not genuine performance.
Communicate clearly and without ambiguity
How you communicate a pay review matters almost as much as what you decide. Employees remember the conversation, not the spreadsheet.
Be specific. Tell employees what their new salary is, when it is effective, and what it reflects. If increases are modest because of business conditions, say so plainly. Vague language ("we considered many factors") reads as evasive and damages trust more than a honest explanation of constraints.
Avoid comparisons between colleagues. Individual salary information is confidential. Managers should be trained to discuss an employee's outcome in terms of their own performance and market position, not relative to peers.
Finally, issue revised appointment letters or salary revision letters promptly. Employees need documentation for loan applications, visa processes, and their own financial planning. Delays create unnecessary friction and signal disorganisation.
---
Run HR and payroll in India with Mellow
Mellow brings HR, payroll and 12 AI agents into one platform — built to handle India properly, with payroll included, from £4 per employee per month. The AI agents don't just answer questions; they generate contracts, run cost estimates and draft letters for you.
[Start a free trial →](/register)